Cheating Preachers & Trusting Trustees

    Board Meeting
    BobLee
    August22/ 2015

    A provocative title to a book, a movie or BobLee commentary should create a curiosity itch you have to scratch. This one fulfills that purpose.

    “Cheating Preachers” scores a 9.5 on most any “provocative” scale.

    “Trusting Trustees” surely has something to do with UNC’s Great Unpleasantness and that continues to be a guaranteed “click magnet” on the level of nekkid cheerleaders and cute kittens videos.

    In recent weeks, I have had my “spider senses” sharpened on how otherwise sane individuals get neck-deep in Uh-Oh stuff. People who should know better…. not crooks or card-carrying moe-rons. “Crooks and moe-rons” surprise us when they DON’T do stoopid crooked stuff.

    Recall that idiot Alabama fan who poisoned the trees at Auburn’s Toomer’s Corner several years ago? The public response shoulda been “How come it took this long for some idiot Alabama fan to do that?”

    Staying in Alabama.  That delicious story of the Alabama sorority video and the horrified harrumph from the university administrators was so totally predictable from all sides….. including that so many of you enjoyed that lovely little kerfluffle.

    ###

    Do you have a positive reaction to the phrase “Board of Trustees”.   Can you utter the phrase without curling your lip or getting acid reflux. It is like “IRS” or “Obama Administration”…. oops naughty BobLee.

    Who has ever said “When I grow up I want to be an astronaut, a cowboy or a trustee….” or “a ballerina, an equine veterinarian or a trustee.”

    Howsabout being a Deacon?  I don’t mean Demon Deacon….. just a Deacon as in Board of Deacons in a church.

    Your institution might call its lay leaders …. “elders” or “session”. Substitute your term for members of the congregation selected to provide guidance to the institution’s professional staff.

    I’ve been on layman boards for several churches over the years. I have never been “a trustee” and I never will be. (1) I do not donate enough $$$ to any organization to ever buy an appointment; and (2) I don’t play well with others. But I have had off-the-record chats with quite a few “trustees” of all sorts of organizations. One phrase keeps coming up…..

    I did not sign on to run the day-to-day operation…. but simply to offer my advice to the staff.

    Trustees and Deacons don’t sign up for the heavy-lifting or for the yucky stuff. Especially not for the “yucky stuff”.

    Some Very Good People can get coerced in to becoming Trustees and often end up being unfairly maligned Their stellar reputations reflect favorably on the institution.   Former trustees I’ve known often recall their experiences with similes used to describe clumsy prostate exams or visits to their cable TV provider.

    …. You want to know about the “cheating preachers”.

    If you are asked to serve as a Deacon in your church…. how likely are you to ever suggest:

    Do we know whether or not Pastor Finnegan is diddling Naomi, that sassy divorcee that plays the organ when Mrs Cathcart is visiting her niece in Saskatoon?

    Unless you have Anthony Weiner-esque pictures or “obscene tweets”, it is unlikely anyone on your board has any reason to suspect Finnegan and Naomi of any philandrity. Especially since Pastor Finnegan is a Hall of Famer PLUS…. “he recruited Charlie Scott”.   ouch!

    If there is no reason to suspect malfeasance, why put in controls to prevent malfeasance that simply could NEVER happen? Is that a sound business strategy?

    Are Trustees / Deacons suppose to be true stewards of their organizations OR simply rubber-stamp “all in favor say Aye” sycophants?

    If your board of deacons / trustees have no “smoking gun” or smoking Naomi; why would you presume to have a PI follow your pastor or…. install hidden cameras in the choir loft or….. take any actions whatsoever assuming anything “yucky” is going on in your Little Blue Chapel On The Hill. ….. If you have a beef with Rev Finnegan or if you have a reputation as a serial troublemaker you would never have been appointed to the board. Cheerleaders Only need apply.

    unicornBack in 2008, anyone who had even a gram of suspicion that The Carolina Way was as bogus as leprechauns riding unicorns to Oz was not going to become a UNC Trustee. I guarantee you.

    If you are not a washed-in-the-blood “true believer” of your intercollegiate institution you will not become one of its trustees. You may not be a hard-core “jock-sniffer” but you better “bleed (insert primary school color)”.

    If you question the Virgin Birth / Resurrection you won’t be a deacon in any mainstream denomination. It is 2015, you could be a lay leader in some uber-progressive Olin T . Binkley Whatever.

    I GUARANTEE you there is NO ONE on Duke’s Board of Whatever they call’em that suspects Mike Krzyzewski of ever jay-walking or having any knowledge of who Myron Piggie was.   Trustees are NOT “Doubting Thomas’s”.   Cheerleaders Only Need Apply. 

    The day before Marvin hit SEND, not one of UNCCH’s thirteen sitting trustees were questioning The Carolina Way…. or whether Dean Smith was the 4th member of the Holy Trinity.   Before UNC or The Titanic hit their respected icebergs, they were both considered “unsinkable”.

    An Ounce of Prevention is Worth Millions of $$$ of Clean-up/Cover-up.

    Do you really believe 60+ Power Five Schools’ Boards of Trustees are now saying to one another:

    Could what happened at UNC be going on here? Is there any way our millionaires Coach Hardrock and Coach SilverTongue could be running eligibility schemes or thug-asylums here on our hallowed campus?

    That question has likely been raised on some boards by some rational minds; and in every case could it happen here was met with ABSOLUTELY NOT HERE at Wonderful Whazzamatta U. ….. Case in point just blew up in Waco, Texas at Baylor.

    Bragging rights-obsessed jock-sniffers will soundly harrumph the dickens out of even a whiff of possible malfeasance.

    I’d love to know which Power Five schools have run their own diagnostic investigations a/k/a academic audits in the wake of Chansky’s nemesis Inspector Wainstein’s controversial looky-see amid the nooks & crannies & lofty pines.

    As castigated as UNC’s BOTs (and BOGs) have been over this mess, the reality is they were poleaxed by this entrenched malignancy.  There had been no reason to “place a hidden camera in the choir loft”.

    Should every advisory board include a few Doubting Thomases?

    Should you ever hire a sassy divorcee as your back-up organist?

    ###

    Some ESPECIALLY Yummy QUIRKIES ….. LINK

    BobLee
    • wolfbuff Reply
      4 years ago

      Equating the BOT and athletic program to a cheatin’ deacon or a perverted politician and the died-in-the-wool kerlina way believers to virgins who believed the smooth talking deacon was wearing protection, then TGU is the resulting baby – which just started Kindergarten today.

      • BobLee Reply
        4 years ago

        I just used “Cheating Preacher” so I could do the Pastor Fennigan and sassy Naomi bit. Other examples of arrogant bureaucracies and ineffective “boards” are innumerable.

    • 58WolfKennel Reply
      4 years ago

      “BL, your beloved N&O had an extensive article this weekend on the politicization of the BOG and the firing of President Ross. It did not make the point that Ross was the encourager (insistence) that Folt get the Wainstein report done. Did he not?”

      • BobLee Reply
        4 years ago

        (1) I trust the readership here knows your “BL, your beloved N&O” is tongue-in-cheek. Other than Dan Kane, I have naught but the most utter contempt for that collection of journo-weasels. Now having said THAT…. the easiest job at the N&O is collecting stoopid crap generated by John “Trainwreck” Fennebresque. Fennebresque is Repubs answer to Bozo Joe Biden. So long as Fennebresque is involved with The UNC BOG it will be chaos personified.
        .
        Who was the first to suggest bringing in a for-real outside investigator i.e. Wainstein? If our only two choices are Tom “Z. Smith” Ross or Chancellor Chihuahua, I would probably go with Ross. Have yet to hear an original thought from “Chihuahua”. Ross, of course, was the one who suggested making “Call Me Dickie” the Athletics Czar of the UNC System. I’m going to bet you don’t think as highly of THAT Ross suggestion as you do Wainstein ???
        .
        Your failure to acknowledge that the BOG has ALWAYS been politicized every bit as much by 40 years of Democ rule as it is now under Repubs, runs contrary to your personal reputation as “a smart man”. You may want to rethink that one. 🙂

    • bob Reply
      4 years ago

      I have often wondered if my school was taking a second and third look at compliance based on what was revealed at UNC. I suspect that they have looked at these issues, at least they should. The real point is that none of the other schools have claimed virginity. I don’t know of another ” What is this place”, Hark the Sound”, “Carolina Way” school that has so tied its existence to being virtuous. That makes the fall much more difficult to understand much less accept. You are on point with the preacher BobLee. I joined a church because the preacher delivered great sermons. I always felt better after listening to him preach, a real calm and peaceful feeling. He met the fate you mentioned. Turned out my faith was better placed in my religion and not with a man. Later BobLee

      • BobLee Reply
        4 years ago

        Excellent Point that needs to be noted more often in TGU. What has made TGU so “U” is that TruBlues staked EVERYTHING on their “virginity” for 40 years. Georgia and Florida, for example, routinely have more crap within their programs…. but they don’t pretend to be virginal AT ALL. …. It is The (Mythical) Carolina Way that is haunting UNC more than “the paper classes” et al.

    • 58WolfKennel Reply
      4 years ago

      BL, it is most tantalizing to conflate TGU with church organization. Have to disagree on “preacher” side, however, because that person is chosen on basis of trust. Therefore I have to put my trust there even paying the price ( vulnerability) when trust is violated.
      With TGU, the preacher equivalent is Chancellor, Athletic Director, Coaches, Academic Leaders.
      I’ve been burned by both preachers and University leaders, but they have always had my trust until proven otherwise.
      Trustees are another matter, however.. They are chosen to bring a broader world view to plan and evaluate. The same goes for Deacons or Elders. In a church when a preacher messes up, it is the “trustee” responsibility to make or recommend punishment.
      In the TGU situation both preacher and trustee have screwed up for years. Human sin can always encroach, but there must always be an accountability which has been missing for years with the primary sin being one of “pride”.
      Who has been hurt? Many students, most faculty members, alumni, the UNC System, and the State of North Carolina are the ones who have been hurt.
      Who can be the resolving “Voice”? Right now I pray for some strong “preacher” to step forth. Otherwise it may take the Voice of GOD.

      • BobLee Reply
        4 years ago

        Ron Reagan’s “Trust but Verify” might fit in somewhere.
        .
        With TGU, the BOT looked to the Chanc for assurance that “all systems were in place”. The Chanc looked to his AthDir who said “Yep, it’s just peachy keen. Want some CW wine … Hark The Sound” and that was as far as any “verifying” went. Then both the clueless preacher (Dickie) Fennigan and Naomi (Deb/Jan) were given big fat pensions and the solution was “lets blame Dan Kane”.
        .
        A hidden camera in the choir loft could not have hurt.

    • 90Lobo Reply
      4 years ago

      “…. Pastor Fennigan diddling Naomi….”
      That is so richly Hilarious.
      Well done!

      • BobLee Reply
        4 years ago

        The key to that was “Saskatoon”. A fun word to say. 🙂

    • SWVA UNCer Reply
      4 years ago

      This has nothing to do with TGU, I suspect it will still be unveiling “hidden” secrets until infinity, or preachers with a hidden resume that would make Ashley Madison survivors blush. but your last statement on Brunswick Stew. Try Bob’s BBQ in good ole’ rural Granville County just off I-85. Their BBQ is ok, but the Brunswick stew is out of this world, and, indeed, thick enough that the soup doesn’t run out of the spoon. The dowdy home grown restaurant has the best. And, the homemade pies are out of this world, just a little pricey.

      • BobLee Reply
        4 years ago

        I’ll travel a long way for great Brunswick stew.

    • porcophile Reply
      4 years ago

      Ah, the parable of the cheating deacon. Well done.
      You know, the sorry thing is that if the Rams Club (or whoever calls the shots in Chapel Hill) had told UNC’s administration five years ago to clean house and apologize, it would all be over by now and Dean Smith’s reputation would be safe. This dodging and weaving and stalling and being too clever by half has done more damage to UNC’s athletic program than Mary and Jay and Dan and Rashad combined. Not to mention the damage it has done to UNC’s reputation as a respectable academic institution. It’s a damn shame.

      • BobLee Reply
        4 years ago

        WHY do parables of philandering men-of-the-cloth always have an appeal ?? 🙂
        .
        WHY would TRC ever do that? The on-field on-court success is of far more importance to them than academic integrity if it has to be “either / or” as seems to be the case.
        .
        OF FAR GREATER IMPORTANCE…. I recently found a GREAT Brunswick Stew joint (thick enough to eat it with a fork…. not glorified vegetable soup!) I am heading there now. Hurry back home Dude.

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.